Audio By Carbonatix
Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, the unions-killed-the-Twinkie trope is still very much alive.
Never mind that Hostess completely failed to adapt to changing tastes or update its brand, that it went through seven CEOs in a decade, that it had already obtained deep concessions from workers while its top executives received pay increases and bonuses, and so on. If only the union workers hadn’t selfishly refused to agree to draconian pay and benefit cuts, the company would still be afloat.
Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported on yet another example of Hostess workers’ shameless greed: they expected the money they had contributed to their pensions to actually go to their pensions. (h/t Dallas Business Journal via CultureMap)
That didn’t happen. Hostess’ $125,000-per-month CEO Gregory Rayburn, who wasn’t around at the time, admitted to the Journal that the snack maker had taken pension contributions — those deducted from Bakery & Confectionary Union & Industry International workers’ wages, not added by the company as matching funds — and used them to fund day-to-day operations as the company slid into bankruptcy.
When news happens, Dallas Observer is there —
Your support strengthens our coverage.
We’re aiming to raise $30,000 by December 31, so we can continue covering what matters most to you. If the Dallas Observer matters to you, please take action and contribute today, so when news happens, our reporters can be there.
“I think it’s like a lot of things in this case,” Rayburn told the paper. “It’s not a good situation to have.”
The workers with the Bakery & Confectionary Union & Industry International would surely agree.
